1.9 C
Hamburg
Monday, January 25, 2021
Home The Weekly MABUX Bunker Index EU ETS' inclusion worries BIMCO

EU ETS’ inclusion worries BIMCO

Baltic and International Maritime Council (BIMCO) is concerned that the inclusion of shipping in the European Union (EU) Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) will inhibit global action on reducing CO2 emissions.

Instead, BIMCO urges the EU to work with the international community at the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to get a global market-based measure established, when the required technology is available, which would ensure the industry operates on a level playing field.

When the EU attempted to unilaterally enforce its ETS on airlines flying in or out of EU in 2012, it was met with stiff opposition from large countries, such as China, India and the United States.

There can be no guarantees that an EU-imposed regional ETS for shipping will not lead to similar responses, and there are many concerns about the consequences of such a failure.

However, IMO has reported that the implementation of its 2020 fuel regulation had been smoother than expected with only 55 Fuel Oil Non-Availability Reports (FONARs) submitted since the introduction of the 0.50% global sulphur cap this year.

In the meantime, oil market fundamentals continue to be weak especially with increasing Covid-19 cases globally, according to the Marine Bunker Exchange (MABUX).

This surge in infections raises the concerns of new lockdown measures on the European continent over the next few months, which may lead to a slower recovery of global oil and fuel demand.

At the same time, the World Bunker Index MABUX has been steady and demonstrated slight irregular changes for a week.

In particular, the 380 HSFO index fell by less than US$1 to US$291.35 / mt, VLSFO gained US$2 to reach at US$348 / mt while MGO increased by US$4.60 to US$412.30 / mt.

Additionally, it is noticed no significant changes in the global scrubber spread (the price difference between 380 HSFO and VLSFO), as it has added only US$1.57 and averaged US$53.41.

The spread in Rotterdam is lagging behind Singapore's index significantly, which has reduced over the past three weeks. The spread in Rotterdam changed during the week to a range of US$54-66, while the weekly average increased by US$6.50 to US$60.50.

In Singapore, the spread rose slightly during the week and climbed to US$72, while the weekly average gained US$2.00 to reach at US$68.33.

In the meantime, bunker sales volumes are starting to pick up again in some ports, with Singapore being an example of such a trend, said MABUX.

Preliminary estimates from the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore on 14 September showed that in August bunker fuel sales in Singapore, added 0.27% on the month and rose 13.6% on the year to 4.17 million mt.

- Advertisment - LR Sustainability Decarbonisation Digital Adverts

Latest Posts

​OOIL to issue new shares on the market

Orient Overseas International Limited (OOIL) has entered into a Placing and Subscription Agreement with Faulkner Global Holdings Limited, its immediate parent company and part...

Updated: IMO Condemns Mozart pirates in escalation of African Piracy

In a significant escalation in West African pirate attacks, one crew member has been killed, while 15 seafarers have been kidnapped, on the container...

CU Lines guarantees equipment for maiden Asia-North Europe service

China United Lines (CULines) is assuring all shippers that it has enough containers to go around as it launches a solo Asia-North Europe service. In...

Port of Rotterdam test smart mooring system

The Port of Rotterdam has installed a smart bollard, developed in collaboration with the mooring and dredging company Straatman BV, along the quay of...

Busan Port Authority to build a new warehouse at the Probolinggo Port

Busan Port Authority (BPA) will establish and operate a bonded warehouse at the Probolinggo Port in East Java in order to expand its logistics...