-0.2 C
Hamburg
Sunday, February 16, 2025
Home Decarbonisation Campaign Shippers fear higher freight costs due to carbon tax

Shippers fear higher freight costs due to carbon tax

Fear prevails in the Global Shippers Forum (GSF), the global business organisation which represents cargo owners exporting and importing to international supply chains.

The reason is the new carbon tax that will be discussed at this week’s meeting of the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) at the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and it seems that it will increase freight costs for shippers beyond the already record levels.

After decades of efforts by the IMO to reach an agreement on the so-called IMO 2023, a set of energy efficiency measures for existing ships, which will take effect next year, MEPC will now consider a further proposal for the introduction of a carbon tax on bunker fuel.

Such a tax will be imposed as an incentive to switch to fuel options with lower carbon emissions and could eventually double the current price of traditional fuels.

GSF, in trying to mitigate the effects, urges regulators to ensure that the ability of shipping lines to remove older capacity from the market, which they consider uneconomical to upgrade to progressively more demanding levels of performance, is not used as a disguised mean for capacity management resulting in higher freight rates.

In addition, given the widespread use of Bunker Adjustment Factors (BAF) and the expansion of new surcharges in anticipation of the introduction of Low Sulfur Fuel in 2020, shippers will be wary of how much of this proposed carbon tax will be levied on them.

Director of GSF, James Hookham, points out, “Shippers will be forgiven for thinking that the proposal, and its consideration at the IMO will inevitable result in still higher freight rates. That’s because the shipping industry has a very efficient mechanism for passing through higher fuel costs in the form of BAF; a surcharge to cover variations in fuel price. There are few reassurances in the existing proposals that a Carbon Tax won’t just be passed through as an added cost for shippers.”

Hookham went on to say, “If the shipping industry is serious about Market Based Mechanisms as a route to decarbonisation then it needs to insulate its customers from their inflationary effects otherwise emissions will be reduced by suppressing demand for world trade rather than by incentivising the step-changes in fuels and propulsion technology, so urgently required.”

Hookham concluded, “The MEPC needs to think through the realities of the shipping market and avoid simplified comparisons with experiences in other sectors of their economies.”





Latest Posts

Why YouTube Shares Matter for Shipping and Supply Chain Brands

If you run a shipping or supply chain brand, having a presence on YouTube is essential to finding new clients and getting your name...

How To Determine The Right Storage Container For Your Needs

From transporting to storing to organizing merchandise, the storage container takes top priority. Whether you're clearing your home, moving, or stashing merchandise, good storage...

The Role of Container Shipping in Global Supply Chains: A Focus on Heavy Equipment

In today's global economy, container shipping is essential to the functioning of numerous supply chains. Efficiently moving goods across oceans is essential to every...

How Indiana can Improve its Infrastructure and Reduce the Number of Car Accidents

How frequently do you, either as a driver or pedestrian witness or hear about traffic accidents? Unfortunately, road accidents have become an everyday occurrence...

Weekly Update: Container Shipping Stock Highlights

The container shipping market saw a dynamic week, marked by notable fluctuations in stock performance among key players. Factors such as tariffs, political tensions,...
error: Content is protected !!