30.6 C
Sunday, August 14, 2022
Home Most Visited FMC questions eight box carriers about surcharges

FMC questions eight box carriers about surcharges

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) has launched an inquiry, asking eight shipping companies to provide information about the congestion and related surcharges they have implemented.

The carriers identified as having recently implemented or announced surcharges and contacted by FMC are CMA CGM, Hapag-Lloyd, HMM, Matson, MSC, OOCL, SM Line and Zim.

The Commission’s Bureau of Enforcement (BoE) has given a deadline for the liner operators until 13 August to provide details that confirm that any surcharges were instituted in accordance with legal and regulatory obligations.

According to a statement, this action was taken in response to communications received by the Commission from multiple parties, reporting that ocean carriers are improperly implementing surcharges.

Ocean carriers are subject to specific requirements related to tariff changes or rate increases, including providing a 30-day notice to shippers and ensuring that published tariffs are clear and definite.

After reviewing the shipping lines' responses, the Commission will examine the surcharges' purposes and the conditions and will determine if they were implemented following proper notice.

FMC can initiate enforcement actions for improperly established tariffs.

"The Covid-related spike in demand for imports has pushed cargo rates to record highs," said FMC Chairman, Maffei. "Now, we hear increasing reports of ocean carriers assessing new additional fees, such as ‘congestion surcharges,’ with little notice or explanation."

Maffei added, "The congestion is due mostly to the tremendous volume of traffic coming from ocean carriers and through ports to satisfy the record demand for imports. Far from being a sudden occurrence or isolated to a port or geographical area, congestion of the freight transportation system is everywhere and has been going on for many months."

FMC Chairman noted that he wants to know the carriers’ justifications for additional fees and that he strongly supports "close scrutiny by the FMC’s Bureau of Enforcement aimed at stopping any instance where these add-on fees may not fully comply with the law or regulation."

Latest Posts

CN Photo Project: The Picture of the Week

Container News wants to thank you all for your participation in the CN Photo Project. Among all the very beautiful photos we have received, the Container News team has...

FMC requests comments on benefits of issuing emergency order requiring information sharing

The US Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) is seeking public comment on whether supply chain congestion has created conditions that warrant the issuance of an...

Forto and Hapag-Lloyd collaborate to deliver biofuel alternatives

Through a new partnership with Hapag-Lloyd, technology company Forto has launched a biofuel programme for maritime transport customers seeking to make their transport greener. More...

Aqaba Container Terminal launches 20-year decarbonisation plan

Aqaba Container Terminal (ACT), the gateway to the Levant region, has announced its decarbonisation strategy. Between 2020 and 2030, the terminal aims to reduce its...

Top 10 Best Undergraduate Cybersecurity Programs

Demand for cyber protection professionals now exceeds supply. The USNC for Statistics shows that the number of new cybersecurity programs has increased by a third....