13.6 C
Hamburg
Monday, May 12, 2025
Home News Early skirmishes in IMO GHG debate from SIDS

Early skirmishes in IMO GHG debate from SIDS

Much of the damage from global warming will be first felt by the small island developing states, known as SIDS, but the early indications are that the island countries are divided in their support for the short-term greenhouse gas (GHG) measures thrashed out by the Intersessional Working Group in mid-October.

The Solomon and Marshall Islands have produced a paper for the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) 75 that explains their position, claiming that the proposals from October’s Intersessional Working Group were not far reaching enough and did not meet the Paris Agreement commitments.

The paper said, “The Fourth IMO GHG Study business-as-usual (BAU) scenarios projecting emissions of 90-130% of 2008 levels in 2050 are clear evidence that existing economic incentives are not sufficient and that new measures will be needed to meet even the least ambitious interpretation of the Initial Strategy [put forward by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in 2018].”

Both the island states believe that there is a real need for concern regarding the substantial increase in methane emissions in the calculation of GHG emissions. Carbon pricing was cited as one of the key missing elements that would show the IMO “is taking climate change seriously,” said an island representative.

“The Committee must revise the Initial Strategy and ensure it aligns with the 1.5°C temperature goal and related quantitative targets for international shipping that are consistent with the Paris Agreement; adopt short-term measures with stringencies that result in significant reductions in carbon intensity and that are aligned with the Initial Strategy’s stated commitments; and accelerate the debate on both mid- and long-term measures and ensure these are developed to be commensurate with the stringency and urgency which is clear in the climate science,” said the islands.

Not all island states were of the same mind, however. Another Pacific SIDS was more pragmatic about the Working Group’s proposals. The islanders acknowledged that there would be an increase in transportation costs as a result of decarbonisation measures, and that these would be felt disproportionately by island states.

However, the island supported the Working Group proposals, which it agreed were a compromise, the state representative said it was the “best deal on the table”.

Nick Savvides
Managing Editor





Latest Posts

Transshipment Power Play: Singapore, Colombo and Salalah compete amid global trade shifts

As geopolitical tides reshape global shipping routes, three key transshipment ports—Singapore, Colombo, and Salalah—are vying for supremacy in the restructured container logistics ecosystem. The ongoing...

Shipping Stocks Weekly: Latest Market Moves

Shipping Stocks Weekly provides a timely overview of how major container shipping companies are performing in the equity markets. The container shipping industry continues to...

Wärtsilä launches commercial carbon capture system for maritime sector

Wärtsilä has officially launched its innovative carbon capture solution (CCS) for commercial use across the global maritime industry, marking a significant advancement in the...

CMA CGM applies North America – West Africa surcharges

French ocean carrier CMA CGM has introduced new Emergency Operational Recovery (EOR) surcharges on shipments from North America to ports in West Africa. ...

Feeder ships outpace larger vessels in investment returns

Consultancy Arthur D. Little said that feeder vessels are now generating a better return than large container ships. The return on investment (ROI) of...
error: Content is protected !!