3.9 C
Hamburg
Saturday, February 8, 2025
Home Industry Opinions E-bikes are a greener alternative but terminal operators beware

E-bikes are a greener alternative but terminal operators beware

Ports, terminals, and logistics facilities are typically designed to accommodate large vehicles and cargo-handling equipment.

The introduction of smaller, more vulnerable road users like e-bikes and e-scooters presents unique challenges. These vehicles are less visible, making traffic management and the prevention of human-machine collisions much more difficult. Typically, terminal traffic layouts and pavement conditions, are designed for large vehicles and plants, not for smaller, more  vulnerable  battery-powered personal vehicles

Cargo handling insurance specialist TT Club has long-standing experience of such terminal risks, TT’s Risk Assessment Manager Neil Dalus comments on the question of paved surfaces in particular. “Designed to withstand high volumes and heavy loads, the terminal surfaces often suffer significant wear and tear, resulting in uneven road conditions. For smaller wheeled battery electric vehicles, these conditions can be hazardous. Traversing rail crossing points, especially when wet, and encountering spills of cargo or oils further increase the risk of accidents. Two-wheeled vehicles, being inherently less stable than four-wheeled vehicles, are particularly susceptible to these hazards,” he highlights, emphasizing the need for operators to take care in introducing their use.

As the use of electric personal vehicles blurs the lines between different user groups within a facility, such as pedestrians, plant and handling equipment operations, TT recommends additional terminal traffic safety planning.  This should include consideration of licensing, training, and personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements.

Additionally, charging and maintenance of these vehicles can also present significant challenges. Emerging data indicates a higher risk of fire during the charging process, necessitating thorough due diligence in the procurement of vehicles and their charging points. Proper fire risk assessments for the location of charging points is essential to mitigate these risks.

Dalus concludes, “While battery-powered personal transport vehicles offer significant benefits in terms of decarbonisation and cost-effectiveness, their integration into ports, terminals, and other logistics facilities however requires careful planning and consideration of risk. Addressing these issues will be crucial to achieving a balance between innovation and safety in the ongoing and rapidly developing drive to achieve a cleaner working environment in the cargo handling industry.”


This article was written by TT’s Risk Assessment Manager Neil Dalus





Latest Posts

Port of Halifax receives Transport Canada grant

The Halifax Port Authority was awarded funding up to CA$22.5 million (US$15.7 million) from Transport Canada through the Green Shipping Corridor Program to prepare...

Port of Gothenburg surpasses 900,000 TEU mark in 2024

In 2024, the Port of Gothenburg handled 909,000 TEUs of containerized cargo, translating to a slight decrease of 1% compared to the previous year's...

VTT leads US$13.2 million project to boost Oulu Port’s security and resilience

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, in collaboration with Oulu Port and 20 other partners, has launched a three-year international project aimed at strengthening...

Understanding and Addressing Challenging Behaviors in Children With Autism: Tips for Parents

For parents navigating the behavior complexities associated with autism, understanding the nuances of their child’s actions can be a continuous challenge. Children on the...

North Sea Port inks partnership deals with Canadian ports

North Sea Port is set to intensify its collaboration with the Canadian ports of Montréal, Québec, Saguenay, Sept-Îles, and Trois-Rivières. This partnership aims to strengthen...
error: Content is protected !!