8.9 C
Hamburg
Tuesday, June 3, 2025
Home News Shippers' crucial decision on Asia-NAEC service variability vs. reliability

Shippers’ crucial decision on Asia-NAEC service variability vs. reliability

Maritime data analysis company Sea-Intelligence said that with incredibly poor schedule reliability across the entire liner shipping industry, it is often instructive to find those marginal gains: which carrier/service/port-pair offers that slightly better service level.

The Danish analysts explain, “It might be that carrier X offers a 5 percentage point advantage over the rest across a certain scope, or maybe, shipping on service ABC might get your cargo to the destination with a delay of five days, instead of 10 with the rest.”

Alan Murphy pointed out that there is, also, the added complexity of service variability.

“We define it as the difference in schedule reliability from one week to the other. The important thing about service variability during the current disruptive environment is the ability to effectively plan supply chain contingencies. For example, before considering schedule reliability, shippers would prefer a service that has a stable service level, and one that does not require exception handling in five out of the 10 weeks,” said Murphy.

Adding schedule reliability to the mix, then shippers have the following important decision to make:

Do shippers prefer a service with a middling level of schedule reliability, but one that is consistent at that level, thus minimising exception handling, or do they prefer a service that has a high level of schedule reliability in as many months as possible, but may require excessive exception handling in the months that it does drop down.

Sea-Intelligence analysed schedule reliability against service variability on the Asia-North America East Coast (NAEC) trade, over both the last six months as well as over the past two-year pandemic period.

In the ideal scenario, the service would be on the bottom right-hand side i.e. high reliability and low variability.

“We can see however, that it is not the case, and that relatively more reliable services often come with the caveat of a greater level of monthly volatility in their reliability, and hence the need for a greater level of exception handling,” noted Murphy.





Antonis Karamalegkos
Managing Editor

Latest Posts

Berg Propulsion powers MPCC feeder vessels with bio-methanol optimization

NCL Nordland, the second of two advanced 1,300 TEU feeder vessels designed to pioneer bio-methanol usage in container shipping, has officially entered service. Sister vessel...

Mitsubishi Gas Chemical and MOL take delivery of Japan’s first dual-fuel methanol carrier

Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company (MGC) announced the successful delivery of a state-of-the-art dual-fuel methanol carrier, chartered from Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL), on a long-term...

Atlantic Forwarding, Atlantic Gate unite under one brand

Atlantic Forwarding and Atlantic Gate unite under one global brand: Atlantic Gate. This rebranding brings together the two entities under one brand. “This rebranding is...

Nuclear-powered vessels gain momentum amid climate push

As the shipping industry seeks radical solutions to meet climate goals and stabilize fuel costs, nuclear propulsion has re-emerged as a transformative force and...

Ukrainian ports face new risks after drone strikes on Russia

On June 1, 2025, Ukraine launched a large-scale, simultaneous drone strike campaign targeting multiple Russian air bases deep inside enemy territory. This marks a significant...
error: Content is protected !!