11.1 C
Hamburg
Sunday, June 8, 2025
Home Industry Opinions Ex-Asia ocean rates ease slightly to start the month

Ex-Asia ocean rates ease slightly to start the month

For shipments to North Europe and the Mediterranean the arrival window for this year’s peak season goods – taking into account longer transit times around the south of Africa and the upcoming Golden Week slowdown in China – is closing, removing some demand-side pressure on rates.

Prices to North Europe remain five times higher than in 2019, but relative to their July peaks rates have now decreased 10% to N. Europe and 19% to the Mediterranean.

On the transpacific, the arrival window is about closed for goods to the East Coast and Gulf before a possible port worker strike on October 1st, which may be reflected in last week’s slight rate decline to the East Coast though prices are still just 2% below their July peak.

The looming strike may be pushing more volumes to the West Coast, supporting some rate rebound since mid-August, but prices are nonetheless 15% below their high for the year reached in mid-July. Some of this rate decline is likely also due to capacity increases, including from opportunistic carriers who launched transpacific services when rates were spiking earlier in the summer.

There are reports of a recent increase in competition for transpacific customers with some of these smaller carriers already offering discounted rates as a result.  If this is an indication of excess capacity on this lane and the larger carriers are forced to follow suit, we could expect rates overall to decrease as well.

At the same time, there are also indications – including increases in rail dwell times at some Long Beach terminals –  that demand remains strong to the West Coast.  Some carriers are actually scheduling extra sailings for the next two months, though this move may be more in anticipation of a growing shift away from the East Coast than an indication of peak season demand stretching into October.

Easing demand and capacity increases had been leading to smoother operations out of India’s west coast ports, but flooding caused by severe storms last week is once again leading to backlogs at the Port of Mundra.

Congestion is still above normal levels at some East Asian hubs. But the better distribution of transhipment containers across more ports compared to back in May when these volumes overwhelmed places like Singapore and Colombo is one factor leading to more manageable wait times at these ports and at those downstream in China.

Cross-border e-commerce volumes continue to be a major driver of air cargo demand, and the industry is continuing to adjust to this new reality. This demand growth – even in what are typically slow months for the market – is keeping rates up as well. Freightos Air Index benchmark rates out of China were US$5.12/kg to N. America last week and US$3.61/kg to Europe.


This article was written by Judah Levine, Head of Research at Freightos





Latest Posts

Port of Long Beach appoints new managing director of engineering services

The Port of Long Beach has appointed Suzanne Plezia, P.E., as its new Managing Director of Engineering Services, succeeding Sean Gamette, P.E., who announced...

DP World and J.P. Morgan launch partnership

DP World Trade Finance has joined forces with J.P. Morgan to enhance access to working capital across emerging markets, addressing the persistent global trade...

Red Sea shipping traffic rebounds as Houthis limit targets

Red Sea maritime traffic has increased by 60% to approximately 36–37 vessels per day since August 2024, as Reuters reported. However, it still falls short...

CMA CGM applies new surcharge from Far East to West Africa

French ocean carrier CMA CGM has announced a peak season surcharge (PSS) for shipments from Northeast Asia, Southeast Asia, China and Hong Kong &...

China to counterbalance Panama setback through South America projects

As geopolitical tensions deepen and shipping lanes become politicized battlegrounds, China is recalibrating its approach to the Western Hemisphere. The recent retreat of CK Hutchison...
error: Content is protected !!