Sunday, June 22, 2025
Home The Weekly MABUX Bunker Index ESCA issues new policy paper for EU ETS costs

ESCA issues new policy paper for EU ETS costs

The European Community Shipowners’ Association (ECSA) has issued a new policy paper in which it calls for vessel operators to bear the costs of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS).

In the paper, ECSA also voices its ‘firm support’ of establishing a dedicated fund under the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to stabilise the carbon price. In fact, ECSA supports that the commercial operator should bear the costs of the EU ETS. The law should require the entity responsible for the decisions affecting the CO2 emissions of a ship to bear the costs arising from the implementation of the EU ETS in the context of a contractual agreement.

European shipowners propose the introduction of a legally binding requirement in the articles of the EU ETS proposal which it said should provide for passing through the costs of the system from the shipping companies to the commercial operators in the context of a contractual agreement.

Meanwhile, on the 45th week of the year, the MABUX World Bunker Index returned to the path of moderate growth. Index 380 HSFO rose to US$522.30/mt, VLSFO index increased to US$655.30/mt, while the MGO index climbed to US$777.74/mt.

Additionally, the average weekly Global Scrubber Spread (SS) – the difference in price between 380 HSFO and VLSFO – rose slightly during the week and reached US$128.41.

At the same time, the average SS Spread in Rotterdam dropped to US$134.67, while the average SS Spread in Singapore, on the contrary, added US$5.83 and reached US$150.

In the meantime, the correlation of MABUX MBP Index (Market Bunker Prices) vs MABUX DBP Index (MABUX Digital Benchmark) in the four global largest hubs over the past week showed that 380 HSFO fuel remained overvalued in only one port, Fujairah.

In all other ports, the MABUX MBP / DBP Index registered an underestimation of the fuel grade. In general, the underestimation rates of the 380 HSFO have not changed significantly.

VLSFO fuel grade, according to the MABUX MBP / DBP Index, has been overpriced at three out of four selected ports while Singapore joined Rotterdam and Fujairah. The only port, according to the MABUX MBP / DBP Index, where VLSFO fuel was underestimated, was Houston.

As for the MGO LS, the MABUX MBP / DBP Index has registered a transition of the price indicators to the overcharge segment in the ports of Fujairah and Houston, while it remains undervalued in Rotterdam and Singapore.





Latest Posts

We Asked AI: Container Ships in Ancient Worlds

Container Ships in Ancient Worlds Imagine a colossal container ship gliding through the Nile as pyramids rise in the distance, or docking at a bustling...

Scenario planning for Mediterranean ports growth amid ongoing tensions

The sustained growth of Mediterranean port traffic, driven by increased Asia-Europe trade and the Red Sea crisis, presents a dynamic landscape for global shipping. Assuming...

Thessaloniki port Revival: Balkan gateway reawakens

 For decades, Thessaloniki was a port with strategic promise but structural limitations, ideally located at the crossroads of Europe and the Balkans, yet constrained...

Vigor Marine Group’s consolidation signals US push to counter China’s shipbuilding dominance

In a bold move to strengthen America’s maritime capabilities, five leading US ship repair and marine service providers have united under a single banner. This...

AI reshape shipping operations

The integration of artificial intelligence into shipping operations, is poised to transform competition in the maritime industry by enhancing efficiency, safety, and sustainability while...
error: Content is protected !!