11.1 C
Hamburg
Sunday, June 8, 2025
Home Most Popular Back haul rates to China hit negative territory

Back haul rates to China hit negative territory

Carriers are paying their customers to move freight from North and South Europe, the Middle East and other backhaul trades, according to Arcon Containers.

Arcon Containers is a tech company looking to improve supply chain efficiency and is part of the Saksham Group based in Mumbai, the group president, Supal Shah, speaking at Container xChange’s Digital Container Summit in Hamburg yesterday, said that all the carriers are effectively paying to transport cargo.

“Containers can be booked from Hamburg to Shanghai for $80 per box, from India and the Middle East it’s $5 per container, but that includes the THC [terminal handling charge] which is around $250 a box, so they [the lines] pay [between $170 and $245] to evacuate their equipment to Asia,” explained Shah.

The movement of empties is a critical cost for shipping lines with the Digital Container Shipping Association’s Alexander Overtoom, claiming that some 60m empty container moves are made each year, at a cost of around US$20 billion.

“If companies can improve their communications with container depots that would increase the availability and visibility of where containers are, giving the carriers better operational efficiencies,” said Overtoom.

Global demand has dropped considerably this year with Drewry Shipping Consultant’s John Fossey, on the same platform as Shah explaining that, “The world fleet is growing faster than demand”.

According to Fossey, capacity will see a 5% increase this year, with negligible demand growth of 0.3% putting rates under continued pressure this year, which is expected to continue in the coming years.

Drewry’s forecasts show demand will recover to 2.6% and 2.9% in 2024 and 2025 respectively, but with 2022 seeing only a 0.5% growth in demand, and capacity increases of 4.5%, it leaves only 2021 as the year where demand will have outstripped capacity growth 7% compared to 4.7%, in the five years from 2021-2025.

However, Fossey also pointed out that the “effective capacity” would be difficult to predict because as the new IMO regulations such as the carbon intensity indicator (CII).

He explained that in the period between 2020 and 2022 when ships were forced to slow down due to congestion in ports and on the landside infrastructure in different trades, the effective capacity was reduced by 7%.

Drewry estimates that around 30% of the existing fleet will eventually need to slow steam as the CII regulation becomes increasingly more stringent as we approach 2030.

Even so, Fossey added that Drewry made a calculation of demand that revealed global growth in container demand would reach 935 million TEUs by 2025. Had the same calculation been made a few years ago the consultants would have forecast that growth would have passed the 1 billion TEUs mark by 2027.


Mary Ann Evans
Correspondent at Large





Latest Posts

Port of Long Beach appoints new managing director of engineering services

The Port of Long Beach has appointed Suzanne Plezia, P.E., as its new Managing Director of Engineering Services, succeeding Sean Gamette, P.E., who announced...

DP World and J.P. Morgan launch partnership

DP World Trade Finance has joined forces with J.P. Morgan to enhance access to working capital across emerging markets, addressing the persistent global trade...

Red Sea shipping traffic rebounds as Houthis limit targets

Red Sea maritime traffic has increased by 60% to approximately 36–37 vessels per day since August 2024, as Reuters reported. However, it still falls short...

CMA CGM applies new surcharge from Far East to West Africa

French ocean carrier CMA CGM has announced a peak season surcharge (PSS) for shipments from Northeast Asia, Southeast Asia, China and Hong Kong &...

China to counterbalance Panama setback through South America projects

As geopolitical tensions deepen and shipping lanes become politicized battlegrounds, China is recalibrating its approach to the Western Hemisphere. The recent retreat of CK Hutchison...
error: Content is protected !!